Reviews You Can Rely On

The 6 Best Running Shoes for Women of 2024

We tested running shoes from Brooks, Nike, Saucony, Hoka, Asics, and others to help you find your perfect pair
gearlab tested logo
Best Running Shoes for Women of 2024
A close-up look at a few of our highest-scoring shoes this season.
Credit: Ally Arcuri
By Ally Arcuri ⋅ Review Editor
Thursday March 28, 2024

Since 2014, our team has tested over 100 of the best and most popular running shoes for women, with 19 of today's top models pitted head-to-head in this review. We have pounded miles of pavement, judging every detail of these kicks along the way. We tested each pair on roads, tracks, treadmills, and light trails, taking in-depth notes on the most influential characteristics. We ran through scorching heat, pelting rain, and gorgeous sunshine while ruthlessly judging responsiveness, landing comfort, stability, upper comfort, and weight. From budget buys to long-distance runners and lightning-fast milers, we've found the perfect kicks for your individualized needs and budget.

Feel prepared when hitting the pavement by checking out our running gear reviews, including everything from the best sports bras to the best women's running shirts, top-ranked women's running hydration pack, and much more. If you think you'd rather focus your running efforts on dirt, we've also reviewed the top women's trail running shoes.

Editor's Note: We updated our lineup of women's running shoes on March 28, 2024, to include the new Brooks Glycerin 21, which has many changes from the Glycerin 20. We cover these changes here and in the individual review.

Related: Best Running Shoes for Men

Top 19 Product Ratings

Displaying 1 - 5 of 19
< Previous | Compare | Next >
 
Awards Editors' Choice Award Top Pick Award Top Pick Award Top Pick Award Top Pick Award 
Price $139.95 at Amazon
Compare at 2 sellers
$160 List
$129.95 at Amazon
$139.95 at Backcountry
Compare at 3 sellers
$159.95 at Amazon
Compare at 2 sellers
$260 List
Overall Score Sort Icon
80
77
76
76
76
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Comfortable, responsive, relatively lightweight, versatileVery responsive, good overall comfort, more affordable than many racing shoes, stable, versatileComfortable, great stability, lots of width options, equipped for distanceFantastic landing comfort, buttery soft upper, great for overpronatorsUltra-responsive, lightweight, great for racing
Cons Lacks traction on slick surfaces, thick heel might not be universally enjoyedHeavy for a responsive shoe, toe box is slightly crampedMight be too structured for some, heavierStack might be too thick for some, heavierLess versatile, very expensive, lacks upper comfort
Bottom Line With its blend of performance technology and comfort, this running shoe will be your first choice for all run typesA great middle-ground between responsive energy return and comfort, this shoe is a pace pusher's race-day dream sidekickThis traditional running shoe comes equipped with everything distance runners need to find comfort and strength during long training runsThis shoe is made for runners who dream of comfortable, pillowy landings during their distance excursionsThis speed-focused road shoe is what you want if you are chasing PRs, Strava segments, or pushing your limits
Rating Categories Asics Novablast 4 -... Puma Deviate Nitro 2 Brooks Adrenaline G... Asics Gel-Kayano 30... Nike Vaporfly 3 - W...
Cushioning and Landing Comfort (25%)
9.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
6.5
Responsiveness (25%)
7.5
9.5
6.5
7.0
10.0
Stability (20%)
8.0
7.0
9.0
8.0
6.0
Upper Comfort (15%)
8.0
7.0
9.0
7.5
5.0
Weight (15%)
6.9
7.4
5.8
6.1
10.0
Specs Asics Novablast 4 -... Puma Deviate Nitro 2 Brooks Adrenaline G... Asics Gel-Kayano 30... Nike Vaporfly 3 - W...
Weight (per shoe, size 6.5) 7.36 oz 7.02 oz 8.21 oz 8.01 oz 4.98 oz
Style Neutral Neutral/race Supportive Neutral stability Racing
Sizes Available 5 - 12 US 5.5 - 11 US 5 - 13 US 5 - 13 US 5 - 12 US
Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop 9 mm 8 mm 12 mm 11 mm 8 mm
Measured Heel Stack Height 40 mm 34 mm 34 mm 37 mm 32 mm
Measured Forefoot Stack Height 31 mm 26 mm 22 mm 26 mm 24 mm
Claimed Heel-to-Toe Drop 8 mm 6 mm 12 mm 10 mm Not stated
Claimed Heel Stack Height 40.5 mm Not stated Not stated 39 mm Not stated
Claimed Forefoot Stack Height 32.5 mm Not stated Not stated 29 mm Not stated
Measured Outsole Length 10.65 in 10.31 in 10.50 in 10.44 in 10.19 in
Measured Outsole Width 4.32 in 4.00 in 4.25 in 4.17 in 3.80 in
Upper Engineered knit mesh Mesh Engineered air mesh Knit mesh Flyknit yarn
Midsole FF Blast Plus Eco Nitro/Nitro-Elite DNA Loft v2 FF Blast Plus Eco Nike ZoomX foam
Outsole AHAR outsole PumaGrip ATR Rubber Rubber PureGel Rubber
Measured Outsole Hardness 59 HA 65 HA 47 HA 70 HA at outer heel, 65 HA rest of shoe 72 HA at forefoot, 49 HA at heel
Heel Tab Type Finger loop None None None None
Width Options Regular Regular Narrow, medium, wide, extra wide Regular Regular
Heel Compression Stiffness 44 lbf 35 lbf 52 lbf 42 lbf 37 lbf
Toe Compression Stiffness 38 lbf 40 lbf 56 lbf 38 lbf 42 lbf
Toe Box Volume 6.2 in^3 6.7 in^3 6.5 in^3 6.4 in^3 6.5 in^3
Rocker Angle 22.0 deg 12.5 deg 26.5 deg 13.5 deg 24.0 deg


Best Overall Running Shoe for Women


Asics Novablast 4 - Women's


80
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Cushioning and Landing Comfort 9.0
  • Responsiveness 7.5
  • Stability 8.0
  • Upper Comfort 8.0
  • Weight 6.9
Weight (per shoe): 7.36 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 9 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Springy
Comfortable
Versatile
Well-balanced
REASONS TO AVOID
Poor traction
Somewhat heavy

The Asics Novablast 4 is a standard-fitting, versatile running shoe that rides better than most. From its trampoline-effect midsole to its geometric outsole, this exciting, newly updated running shoe will take you through your training in comfort. Asics created a maximally cushioned shoe that provides powerful energy return, making it suitable for runners and runs of all types. While the Novablast houses a pretty chunky design, its lightweight materials prevent it from feeling too thick or imbalanced underfoot.

As with many road-specific shoes, the Asics Novablast 4 lacks the traction necessary for slick, wintery surfaces. The Novablast does everything well except for gripping a damp road, taking it out of contention as a crossover shoe for trails. Since it is a well-cushioned shoe, the Novablast 4 weighs 7.36 ounces per women's size 6.5 shoe. This is slightly more than race-focused options, and if that is what you're after, you may prefer the Nike Vaporfly 3 instead. But knowing that the Novablast offers a balanced ride with bouncy energy return, we'll gladly tote around the extra few ounces. Runners needing a single high-performing shoe will enjoy the pep, comfort, and look of the updated Novablast.

Read more: Asics Novablast 4 review

The newest version of the Novablast is an all-around winner of a shoe, with trampoline-style energy return, lightweight cushion throughout, and an impressively comfortable upper.
Credit: Natalie Kafader

Best Bang for Your Buck


Saucony Kinvara 14 - Women's


74
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Cushioning and Landing Comfort 7.5
  • Responsiveness 7.5
  • Stability 6.0
  • Upper Comfort 7.0
  • Weight 9.3
Weight (per shoe): 5.55 oz| Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 5 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Lightweight
Peppy
Versatile
REASONS TO AVOID
Less durable outsole
Lacks lateral stability

The Saucony Kinvara 14 is a versatile road running shoe available for less than many of our other top contenders, making it a high-value option. With a peppy PWRRUN foam midsole and ultra-lightweight build, the Kinvara feels nearly weightless during runs. It is cushioned well enough for long distances, but its flexible responsiveness lends itself beautifully to workouts when you want to pick up the pace. We recommend the Kinvara because of its versatile structure and fantastic price point.

The Kinvara is a lightweight shoe, meaning it lacks the lateral stability found in some of its heavier counterparts. Runners seeking stability or a super plush feeling may find the minimal build of this shoe lacking — though the stack is noticeably higher on the Kinvara 14 than it was on the 13, a change that has proven pretty divisive among users. The outsole of the Kinvara is also a bit foamier than some, making it a poor choice for crossing over into burlier terrain. But if you are searching for a versatile shoe with a wallet-friendly price, we still feel the Kinvara is the best value. If you are looking for a more stable shoe that is still within the realm of affordability, you may want to look at the New Balance Fresh Foam X 880v13.

Read more: Saucony Kinvara 14 review

We tested the breathability of the Kinvara 14 outside and then took it to the lab to examine just how breathable this shoe is.
Credit: Abriah Wofford

Best Balance of Comfort and Responsiveness


Puma Deviate Nitro 2 - Women's


77
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Cushioning and Landing Comfort 7.0
  • Responsiveness 9.5
  • Stability 7.0
  • Upper Comfort 7.0
  • Weight 7.4
Weight (per shoe): 7.02 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 8 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Very responsive
Balanced comfort
Great entry point for racing
On the affordable side
REASONS TO AVOID
Heavy for a racing shoe

The Puma Deviate Nitro 2 is our top recommendation for a versatile and race-ready shoe due to its strong responsiveness and balanced cushion. The padding is intelligently placed, providing comfort suitable for longer races but responsive enough to help you break a new PR. This could be a great option for runners looking for their first racing shoe. Veteran runners motivated to shed time and PR on the regular will also enjoy the fit, speed, and affordability offered by this shoe.

The Deviate Nitro 2 is slightly more built than other racing kicks on the market, contributing to its slightly heavier weight. Other racing shoes (like the Nike Vaporfly 3) are ultra-lightweight, but they ultimately lack the comfort and support of this one. Runners in need of a plush ride won't enjoy the scant yet specific cushioning of the Deviate, but if a comfortable-for-racing shoe is what you are looking for, this is a fantastic place to start. If you prefer comfort over performance, we recommend checking out the Brooks Ghost 15, which is slightly less responsive but scores higher in the cushioning and landing comfort metric.

Read more: Puma Deviate Nitro 2 review

We cut all our running shoes in half to both examine the performance properties and measure them all identically so that you can make an apples-to-apples comparison of key performance specs.
Credit: Matt Lighthart

Best Stability Running Shoe


Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 - Women's


76
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Cushioning and Landing Comfort 8.0
  • Responsiveness 6.5
  • Stability 9.0
  • Upper Comfort 9.0
  • Weight 5.8
Weight (per shoe): 8.21 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 12 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Comfortable
Stable
Affordable
Many width options available
REASONS TO AVOID
Less responsive
May feel overbuilt for some

The improved Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is an upgraded version of a reliable favorite. With built-in GuideRails, a DNA Loft midsole, and enough upper comfort for long, steamy runs, this is one of our top recommendations for most runners. The Adrenaline fits like a classic road running shoe, adding familiarity to one of Brooks' most popular lines. Runners seeking a durable, marathon-worthy shoe with stability at its heart will love the Adrenaline 23 and everything it has to offer.

The Adrenaline is a shoe built for stability, which works well for runners who overpronate. For some, the slight rigidity of the lateral edges might be more noticeable than is preferred. Still, it's a great option for distance efforts, and the weight and responsiveness reflect this. While not a sprinting shoe, we feel the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as evidenced by the final scores. If reliability, comfort, and a bit of support are what you're after, we wholeheartedly recommend the updated Adrenaline 23.

Read more: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 review

For long-lasting comfort, prime stability, and the strength to go the distance, the Adrenaline is an excellent distance shoe to add to your rotation.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Best Underfoot Cushion


Asics Gel-Kayano 30 - Women's


76
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Cushioning and Landing Comfort 9.0
  • Responsiveness 7.0
  • Stability 8.0
  • Upper Comfort 7.5
  • Weight 6.1
Weight (per shoe): 8.01 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 11 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Fantastic underfoot cushion
Buttery soft upper comfort
Responsive enough
REASONS TO AVOID
Heavier
Heel stack will be too thick for some
Runs a bit small

If you have been dreaming of a super plush shoe with buttery soft laces and enough responsiveness to get you hustling, look no further because we have the answer to your prayers. The Asics Gel-Kayano 30 is the super-cushioned, maximalist shoe that all others wish they could be. Its thick and comfortable stack hosts enough energy return to be considered responsive while providing some rearfoot stability. If comfort is what you're after, this shoe might be your perfect match.

The Gel-Kayano 30 runs a bit short in length, so we recommend sizing up by half a size when you buy. The chunky outsole is cozy as can be, but this shoe also runs on the heavier side due to all the comfort elements. And even though the outsole is semi-responsive, many other shoes are more speed-focused if that is what you desire. The thickness of the stack on this shoe certainly isn't going to be every runner's cup of tea, but for those looking for optimal comfort while running, this is a great shoe to try out. Hoka fans might consider the similar Hoka Clifton 9, although it scored just slightly lower in a few of our test metrics (you can directly compare the two models here).

Read more: Asics Gel-Kayano 30 review

We wanted to see why the Gel-Kayano is so comfortable, so we cut it in half to examine the unique gel sole. The last image in this montage shoes our breathability test with a mini fog machine.
Credit: Abriah Wofford

Best for Racing


Nike Vaporfly 3 - Women's


76
OVERALL
SCORE
  • Cushioning and Landing Comfort 6.5
  • Responsiveness 10.0
  • Stability 6.0
  • Upper Comfort 5.0
  • Weight 10.0
Weight (per shoe): 4.98 oz | Measured Heel-to-Toe Drop: 8 mm
REASONS TO BUY
Ultra-responsive
Incredibly lightweight
Perfect for racing
REASONS TO AVOID
Less supportive
Lacks versatility
Super expensive

The Nike Vaporfly 3 is, hands down, the most responsive shoe we tested this season. With a full-length carbon fiber plate embedded into the outsole, a wildly minimal upper, and a streamlined fit, this shoe comes out of the box ready to race. Its skewed lace bed structure ensures a snug fit, and the Flyknit yarn weave of the upper provides prime breathability. Once you start to dial up your speed in the Vaporfly, you're met with a pop, pop, pop sound as one footfall powerfully encourages the next.

If you aren't looking for a speed shoe, don't buy the Vaporfly 3. It has a high stack, responsively rigid outsole, and minimalistic upper, so it lacks the versatility to be a daily trainer or a distance training shoe. The upper weave works well for racing, but this is not the shoe we recommend for runners needing stability — our top choice for stability is the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23. The Vaporfly is also quite expensive, nearly double the price of many shoes we tested. However, if it fits into your budget and training plan, the Vaporfly is a great investment for race days and speed work.

Read more: Nike Vaporfly 3 review

Our breathability test with the fog machine shows just how light and breathable the upper of the Vaporfly is.
Credit: Matt Lighthart

Compare Products

select up to 5 products to compare
Score Product Price
80
Asics Novablast 4 - Women's
Best Overall Running Shoe for Women
$140
Editors' Choice Award
77
Puma Deviate Nitro 2 - Women's
Best Balance of Comfort and Responsiveness
$160
Top Pick Award
76
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 - Women's
Best Stability Running Shoe
$140
Top Pick Award
76
Asics Gel-Kayano 30 - Women's
Best Underfoot Cushion
$160
Top Pick Award
76
Nike Vaporfly 3 - Women's
Best for Racing
$260
Top Pick Award
76
Hoka Clifton 9 - Women's
$145
74
Saucony Kinvara 14 - Women's
Best Bang for Your Buck
$120
Best Buy Award
74
Brooks Ghost 15 - Women's
$140
73
Altra Torin 7 - Women's
$150
71
New Balance Fresh Foam X 880v13 - Women's
$165
70
Hoka Mach 5 - Women's
$140
70
Adidas Supernova Rise - Women's
$140
69
Lululemon Blissfeel 2
$128
69
Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 - Women's
$170
65
Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 40 - Women's
$130
65
Brooks Glycerin 21 - Women's
$160
63
Hoka Bondi 8 - Women's
$165
63
Brooks Hyperion Max - Women's
$170
61
Asics Gel-Nimbus 26 - Women's
$160

running shoes womens - we put in the work testing dozens of running shoes, so you don&#039;t...
We put in the work testing dozens of running shoes, so you don't have to. We take notes as we go and put each pair through the wringer to determine which options might be best for your unique needs.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Why You Should Trust Us


Over the last decade, our running experts have tested over 100 pairs of the most popular running shoes. Before kicking off our testing, we extensively researched the market, spending hours comparing features, materials, and fit to help you find the best options out there. Once our lineup was solidified, we tested these running shoes for several months, where we truly put them through the wringer. We subjected each contender to over 30 miles of running, which is more than 480 miles overall, running hard and far to find which kicks can hold up and which aren't worth the time. We ran on various terrains, such as pavement, beaches, tracks for speed workouts, and dirt trails. Yes, our legs are tired, but we wouldn't have it any other way.

What About Stack Height?


We take our own stack height measurements for the shoes we test and calculate the heel-toe drop differential using these measurements. You may notice that our reported measurements sometimes differ from the numbers presented by manufacturers. Scratching your head? This is because there is no true industry standard for measuring the stack height of running shoes. Each company can choose how to take these measurements without disclosing their methods. We cut each shoe in half on a band saw and take standardized measurements based on the World Athletics requirements. With this information, we can give you a more accurate comparison between models. Our stack height and subsequent heel-toe drop calculations include the insole, midsole, and outer tread — in other words, everything that is underneath your foot while you are wearing the shoe.

We literally peel back the layers of each shoe to find out what they are made of. We measure everything to determine if the manufacturer's claims hold true.
Credit: Abriah Wofford

Beyond just testing road running shoes out in the field, we cut them open and assess what they are made of in our lab. We measure and remeasure stack heights, outsole thicknesses, heel-to-toe differentials, and dozens of other things to see if they match what the manufacturers claim. In many cases, we found slight discrepancies, which further informed our testing process.

Our tests are grouped into five weighted rating metrics:
  • Cushioning and Landing Comfort (25% of overall score weighting)
  • Responsiveness (25% weighting)
  • Stability (20% weighting)
  • Upper Comfort (15% weighting)
  • Weight (15% weighting)

Before, during, and after all the actual running, every shoe was also rigorously inspected and tested.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Our lead road running expert is exercise specialist Ally Arcuri. She is an avid runner, fitness junkie, cancer survivor, accomplished ultramarathoner, PE teacher, and yoga teacher. Ally has broken tape at quite a few middle-distance races and intends to win more now that her cancer journey is behind her. You can find Ally and her dog out running, from open roads to beaches to trails. Her years of work in physical therapy help guide her through the sea of running gear available, and a degree in kinesiology provides valuable scientific insight.

The updates to the Mach make it an even more enjoyable running buddy.
The updates to the Mach make it an even more enjoyable running buddy.
Shoes that are built for speed tend to weigh less than those built...
Shoes that are built for speed tend to weigh less than those built for comfort.
We scour the internet for information before cutting each pair open...
We scour the internet for information before cutting each pair open to see what they're truly made of.
We take notes on the on-foot feel of every model during our runs and then take in-lab measurements to compare each shoe.

Analysis and Test Results


Whether you're training for a marathon or walking your dog, picking the right shoe for your needs can be challenging. Recent advancements in materials and design have led to a bewildering array of choices, with every company catering to a different need. Plus, the improvements made in traditional models, the progression toward minimalist or barefoot footwear, and the recent eruption of maximally cushioned products have added new layers of complexity. Luckily, we are here to help you make sense of it all and guide you towards finding your new running mate.

Every pair of shoes we tested saw at least 30 miles of pavement. Testing side by side allows us to really tease apart the nuance of various features and designs.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Before diving in, it's important to decide if road-specific running shoes are the best choice for you. If you run primarily on roads, sidewalks, the treadmill, or a track, you are in the right spot. Even if you take an occasional cruise through dirt roads and light cross-country trails, a road-running shoe will likely be your best option. If you are more interested in bombing down rocky trails, our lineup of epic trail running shoes will have better options for you, many of which crossover onto roads beautifully.


Value


At GearLab, we buy all of our products at retail prices just like you and have our testing team put them through an aggressive battery of tests without looking at the price tag. We consider the price only after accurately and fairly scoring each pair of shoes across our metrics. We've found that value, durability, and versatility go hand-in-hand. If a shoe only performs well in one situation, its value is often lower than a more well-rounded option. Some shoes are designed for very specific purposes, like the race-ready (and very expensive) Nike Vaporfly 3. It is up to you to determine if you want to invest in one versatile, high-value shoe or in an array of kicks with different strengths.

There are dozens of running shoes on the market, and we tested a mere fraction. When it comes to finding a dream running shoe that will fit your needs and budget, it is important to decide what kind of running you'll be doing and how often, then you'll be able to determine which shoe provides a great value for you.
Credit: Abriah Wofford

The Saucony Kinvara 14 is at the top of our list when it comes to value. Available for less than many of the other shoes on the market, its comfort and versatility solidify its standing. The Brooks Adrenaline and the Asics Novablast 4 are other excellent choices in terms of value. Though they cost more than the Kinvara, both are highly versatile. A shoe that you can wear daily, or in most situations, has the makings of a fantastic value.

The versatility and comfort of the Kinvara make it one of our top recommendations for runners seeking a great value.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Cushioning and Landing Comfort


Whether you run a few miles a year or are tied to a rigorous training schedule, it's called "pounding pavement" for a reason. With that pounding in mind, our testers consider this metric one of the most important evaluation criteria for road-focused running shoes.


Nothing makes someone want to stop running more than tired, blistered feet or achy joints, so we used this category to judge a few different shoe traits. We review the ability to cushion the feet and provide adequate shock absorption for each contender. We also compare the construction of midsoles and materials through feel and by cutting each pair open in our lab. Deconstructing each pair in this way gave us a holistic view of what each shoe is made of and how well each holds up to the manufacturers' claims of underfoot cushion. We got to know each shoe and assessed its ideal running scenarios, whether built for long runs or speed workouts (or neither).

Our lineup includes many shoes that offer excellent landing comfort and cushioning. Not only do these comfortably-stacked shoes make great running companions, but they are also perfect for people who spend long days on their feet.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Maximalist-style shoes are trending, and many brands are keeping up with the demands. Out of the shoes we tested, Asics rose to the tippy top in this metric with the innovative releases of the Novablast 4 and the Gel-Kayano 30. Their plush underfoot stacks and buttery rebounds make them shoes for runners seeking a bit of luxury during their pavement-pounding sessions. The heel of the Kayano stands at 37mm, and the forefoot at 26mm; the Novablast stands at 40mm in the heel, and 31mm in the forefoot - talk about a thick stack! While the Asics Gel-Nimbus 26 didn't score high marks across the board, it is an honorable mention when it comes to maximalist cushion because of how overbuilt it is. With a total stack height of 41mm, it stands out as the shoe with the most cushion stuffed into its architecture.

The Gel-Kayano is our top recommendation for ultimate underfoot comfort and cushioning.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

The Hoka Clifton 9 scored slightly behind the Novablast 4 and the Gel-Kayano 30, but barely. The Clifton is a standout shoe in many metrics, but especially when it comes to underfoot cushion. With a thick stack and pillowy landing comfort, it is a great shoe to check out if your joints are begging you for comfort. Much like the Kayano, the Clifton is tall. Its stack is 34mm and 28mm in the heel and forefoot, respectively, providing a thick crash pad for your feet.

running shoes womens - the clifton is a lighter-weight option that still offers great...
The Clifton is a lighter-weight option that still offers great landing comfort and cushioning.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

If a maximalist-style shoe is not for you, some traditionally shaped options can also offer optimal landing comfort. The award-winning Brooks Adrenaline 23 and Brooks Glycerin 21 are two classic-style kicks with great underfoot comfort. The Glycerin was released with a bit of additional midfoot cushion, but it maintains its traditional feeling. The Brooks Ghost 15 is another high-scoring shoe in this metric, thanks to its specifically-placed cushion.

The updated to the Glycerin have changed its fit and feel, but its...
The updated to the Glycerin have changed its fit and feel, but its comfort remains.
We love how the Adrenaline&#039;s fit is familiar, but it provides...
We love how the Adrenaline's fit is familiar, but it provides comfort akin to some of the more maximalist options.
The Ghost has well-rounded cushion, making it a great choice for...
The Ghost has well-rounded cushion, making it a great choice for runners who want to prioritize a foot-hugging sensation.
While thickly cushioned shoes may weigh a bit more, the tradeoff for the extra comfort may be worth it, depending on your running goals.

Responsiveness


Responsiveness describes how a shoe responds to the energy you put into it, how quickly and efficiently your feet travel through the motions of each stride, and how agile you feel doing so. Often but not always, the higher a shoe scores in responsiveness, the lower it scores in landing comfort, and vice versa. The thicker and softer cushioning that increases landing comfort can sometimes make a shoe feel spongy and hinder responsiveness. This is something to consider when prioritizing shoe features.


Manufacturers have greatly increased the balance of cushioning and responsiveness in ultra-comfy kicks through new technologically advanced foams, materials, and shoe geometry. While individual foot shape and muscle composition can dictate how agile a runner may feel in a certain pair of shoes, certain patterns and indicators help us reasonably assess this complicated metric. In addition to feeling out responsiveness through miles on the road, we measure the rocker angle in our lab to gauge how much of a forward roll it will provide.


The most responsive shoes in our lineup all have carbon fiber plates embedded into their soles, which provide a strong launchpad for runners. Instead of simply absorbing the impact, these plates almost propel the body forward, ensuring that the energy put into each footfall is returned. The Nike Vaporfly 3 is the most responsive shoe we tested this season. With a sleek shape and powerful outsole, this is the shoe we recommend to runners looking to tackle speedwork and set PRs. While not a great everyday shoe, the Vaporfly is a prime pick for racing since it provides such powerful energy return.

running shoes womens - the shape, weave, and fit of the vaporfly all come together to...
The shape, weave, and fit of the Vaporfly all come together to create the ultimate racing shoe.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

The Puma Deviate Nitro 2 earned incredibly high marks in this metric as well. Also hosting a carbon plate, the Deviate Nitro offers a bit more softness than the Vaporfly, which makes it more appropriate for daily training and longer races. The Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 is another highly responsive running shoe with a plate for added propulsion. The Endorphin Speed also offers a streamlined fit but with a slightly more convex shape and softer body, two elements that create a more forgiving ride than the aforementioned Deviate and Vaporfly.

running shoes womens - here you can see the underfoot stack and slightly convex shape of...
Here you can see the underfoot stack and slightly convex shape of the Saucony Endorphin 3.
Credit: Jessica Riconscente

If you want a shoe that will help you get moving but want to shy away from plated kicks, we don't hesitate to recommend the Asics Novablast 4. This shoe is an example of what a perfectly executed balance looks like in the world of running shoes. It is lightweight and comfortable for all-day excursions but offers spring when you need it without the addition of a carbon-fiber plate.

running shoes womens - we spend a lot of time analyzing the data we find and can often...
We spend a lot of time analyzing the data we find and can often predict how a shoe will perform based on this. However, our on-the-ground testing team gets physical in all of our kicks to deeply understand how well they perform.
Credit: Natalie Kafader

Stability


Stability is another crucial metric in the world of running. When referencing stability, we are talking about the lateral stability a shoe offers. Lateral stability is significant for runners who tend to over or underpronate while running. Over time, small imbalances can lead to huge, lingering injuries. Running shoe manufacturers add structural support by reinforcing the lateral midsole of their shoes. Sometimes, they insert more rigid materials to stabilize the shoe and promote proper foot alignment through the stride.


In general, we have found that stability-increasing structures and weight are at odds, but the extra ounces are often worth a lifetime of proper running form. Many speed shoes lack stability, so it is up to you to determine whether you want a lineup of shoes or just one pair. If possible, we recommend having a pair for long, daily runs and a more responsive pair for speed work and racing. Of course, it isn't always an option to purchase and tote around multiple pairs. In that case, opting for something with a balance of responsive energy return and stability is the way to go.

Observing how shoes flex and bend under pressure is one way to determine how much or little stability they offer.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Overpronation can be caused by weak glute muscles, unstable ankles, or years of training with an inefficient gait pattern. If you find your ankles rolling in slightly while on the run, we recommend trying out a pair of running shoes made specifically to correct this postural misalignment.

The Brooks Adrenaline and the Asics Gel-Kayano are two of our top recommendations when it comes to lateral stability. The former has built-in structures to encourage proper gait patterning, and the latter has a bulbous heel shape that helps correct wonky strides.

running shoes womens - the wide heel chunk of the gel-kayano 30 helps feet roll into proper...
The wide heel chunk of the Gel-Kayano 30 helps feet roll into proper alignment.
Credit: Ally Arcuri


The Altra Torin 7 is a super stable shoe that earned its merits here by providing a zero-drop differential instead of extra structures. By forcing the heel to ride in line with the toe (or 1mm higher, as we measured in our testing), the body can rely on the rear musculature for additional strength and security. Zero-drop shoes are not for all runners, but they are fantastic for those prone to rolling their ankles because the shape helps prevent it.

running shoes womens - zero drop shoes tend to work well for runners who have weak ankles...
Zero drop shoes tend to work well for runners who have weak ankles because they help prevent rolling.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

The Brooks Ghost and the Hoka Clifton are both honorable mentions in this category as well. Even without specified structures, all three pairs provide balanced structure and comfort.

The firm and balanced structure of the Clifton makes it a great shoe for runners who want understated stability and strong comfort.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Upper Comfort


Aside from style, the first thing we notice about a shoe is its upper comfort. We are highly picky about how the tongue and lace combo touches our feet — nobody wants the lace bed digging into their upper foot — so we weeded out the aggressive from the smooth. The flexibility of materials, foot box shape, and overall upper design and construction all play into this, ideally coalescing in a shoe that lets you forget you're even wearing it. Feet often swell as your running heats up, so tight and unforgiving laces that obstruct blood flow are a sure way for a shoe to get a lower score in this area.


The high-scoring Brooks Adrenaline earned top marks in this category due to its familiar fit, comfortable weave, and variety of width options. The tongue of the Adrenaline is nearly half an inch thick, providing great comfort across the lace bed. The Brooks Glycerin and Asics Novablast 4 both scored closely behind the Adrenaline.

running shoes womens - the upper of the novablast is lightweight, breezy, and remains...
The upper of the Novablast is lightweight, breezy, and remains comfortable on long distance excursions.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Brooks seems to have nailed upper comfort in a traditional shoe shape, while Asics has devised newer, softer weaves for comfort in their uppers. The tongue of the Glycerin stands out because of how plump and protective it is. This adds to its overall comfort. When it comes to the Glycerin, though, its upper weave can be an asset or a drawback, depending on your perspective. The upper of the new Glycerin is a bit thicker and tighter than its predecessors, making it run a bit warm. This is a fantastic attribute if the majority of your running takes place in colder climates. This feature might be a drawback if your runs take you through warmer temperatures.

running shoes womens - the upper of the glycerin is incredibly comfortable, though it does...
The upper of the Glycerin is incredibly comfortable, though it does run a bit warm.
Credit: Natalie Kafader

The Lululemon Blissfeel 2 is a standout because of its unique-to-you upper. The knit of the upper textile conforms to your feet after just a few runs, providing a more tailored upper than most. The upper does run hot, though, which caused us to deduct a few points from the Blissfeel's overall score.

running shoes womens - the blissfeel has a way of conforming to your feet with wear. the...
The Blissfeel has a way of conforming to your feet with wear. The upper runs a bit hot, so keep that in mind if you run in the heat a lot. But if cooler-weather runs are your thing, this is a great shoe to consider.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

The Nike Pegasus 40 stands out but in a slightly different way than the Blissfeel. The cushy upper, plush tongue, and roomy toe box offer a bit more comfort than past versions. When you are spending hours running in a shoe, ensuring that the upper fits your unique anatomy in a comfortable way is crucial to executing enjoyable runs.

running shoes womens - the cushioned upper of the nike pegasus make it an awesome choice...
The cushioned upper of the Nike Pegasus make it an awesome choice for runners who seek soft comfort in a daily trainer.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Another standout is the New Balance FreshFoam X 880v13. The upper of this versatile runner fits like the most delicious sockliner you've ever felt. It encases your feet in soft, supple synthetic mesh and provides ample toebox real estate. The toebox gives your toes enough space to splay and adjust to the terrain as you run, and it is also built tall enough to eliminate any pressure or pain on your toes vertically.

running shoes womens - though not an overall award winner, the new balance fresh foam is...
Though not an overall award winner, the New Balance Fresh Foam is worth mentioning because of how comfortable and soft its upper is.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Weight


We can't deny that shoe weight affects running ability, but we caution against judging shoes based solely on this metric. This may be one of the first things we notice as we pull shoes out of the box — could a few ounces hold the key to your running success? It all depends on what your goals are. Unless elite-level racing is in your near future, we'd suggest using weight as a secondary deciding factor after more noticeable criteria like upper and landing comfort. Once you've narrowed down your selection slightly, you can use weight to hone in on your final choice.


The lightest shoe we tested is the Nike Vaporfly 3, which is why we love it as a racing shoe. The Saucony Kinvara 14 is another extremely lightweight shoe, though far less niche (and almost mindbogglingly cheaper). If you want a lightweight shoe with some versatility, the Kinvara is worth considering. The Hoka Mach 5 is a fantastic option if you want combined levity and speed. It rides like a responsive shoe but with enough comfort for long, easy distances.

running shoes womens - we love the hoka mach 5 for its great cushioning and responsiveness.
We love the Hoka Mach 5 for its great cushioning and responsiveness.
Credit: Ally Arcuri

Conclusion


The footwear market, especially running shoes, is oversaturated with options and full of lingo and misleading marketing. Therefore, finding the right running shoe to add to your kit can be a huge and daunting task. Fortunately, we have the details you need to make an informed decision. We spent months reviewing the most popular women's models on the market, from lightweight minimalist superstars to plush maximalist mileage hogs — and everything else in between. Have fun out there!

Ally Arcuri